Insight / ChatGPT apps and MCP
ChatGPT apps and MCP: three product decisions before you build.
An MCP server can connect tools to an AI host. It does not decide which customer job deserves a conversational interface, what the user should approve, or how a product team will operate the result.
Direct answer
Before building a ChatGPT app, choose one user job, define the product-owned action boundary, and make a host-specific plan for authentication, UI, testing, and release.
01 / Start with the task
Pick a job that finishes in the product.
The first question is not “which tools can we expose?” It is “which customer task becomes shorter when the request starts in a conversation?” A strong candidate crosses a few known product surfaces and ends in a result a person can inspect.
A narrow job also makes it possible to decline the rest of the product surface until the team has evidence that the first release is useful.
02 / Keep the product in charge
MCP is a connection layer, not a replacement backend.
The host can discover and call named tools. The application still owns authentication, authorization, validation, business rules, state, and the record of a completed action. Those responsibilities should remain visible in the tool contract and in the product’s own logs.
This is what lets the team add a conversational request surface without creating a second version of the product that behaves differently.
OpenAI Apps SDK · build an MCP server03 / Treat the host as a product surface
ChatGPT still has its own interaction and release rules.
A product may share core tools across AI hosts, but the host’s authentication, interactive UI, review, and publishing behavior can differ. Plan explicit verification for the surface where customers will actually use the app.
The useful promise is compatibility with a tested workflow, not a vague claim that every host behaves the same way.
04 / Preserve human control
A clear tool description is part of the interface.
Tool names and descriptions tell both the model and the user what an action can do. For sensitive operations, show the consequence and keep confirmation visible. Avoid a tool that compresses multiple irreversible changes into one friendly-sounding command.
A smaller, explained interaction is easier to ship, audit, and improve.
Model Context Protocol · tools specification